I feel more or less instinctively (more or less because I would not break your balls with a mysticism that is moved by some dark shameless trick the superego eh, I'm not there yet, although my story with Ele moving quietly toward the yawning) that is equal to saying that player. Equal to itself because we do not transcribe boredom (unspeakable for the shot, but I make an effort to avoid clicheton needy, you'll notice) the identity reduced to itself, which is reminiscent of the grotesque occurred pubs there's no harm: "I Am What I Am", overlooking Roddick and others. Desolation, I Am What I Am. Centuries of introspection and search for meaning clumsy or truth, great historic rights, only to end up in the ditch, I am what. And it would have been much better to stop there, so ultimately more honest, even if done in humility and putassière upset. In
reader, I do not see too much need to explain this. The effort to go, crossing the ink raised, to find some eventually. A story, but as others. Not a mountain torrents which are sufficient to make the cake of his own bloated contemplation. No images that for once, between two speeches, we can bring the nipple (which will, we can summarize). The ink stupid. And it looks like existence, this obstinate way to get tired for nothing. So the reader is, unless we come to challenge my brilliant demonstration, I expect you, the species closest to humans. No it's not the dolphin.
I thought that when reading something, bright enough to remain (it talked about stars and how to be cool) who had contracted, with anger and bitterness. What suits me enough. I'm an extremely low content, while devastation and sudden release. This is far from being interesting, but has the particular substantial support my dissertation a little lapse of departure, and what, we cling to what may, I say instinct, not insight. I was a bit quieter for me to be mediocre player. I was not far from what (it spun like figure, eh? Confess anyway).
This text was not bad. Some formulas, and the specification, which created the context (or atmosphere, I translate for youth). One thing that was changing, not music (the music of words, no kidding, two bullets in the head), but with secondment (the chair of the screen, eyes and algorithms): the moment something exists (where you see images in the text, always young) (yes, "something exists" is a freelancer for the runs, but there I go to the essentials, because it's late . It is that it recognizes that the school: the concern of the incipit, and the subsequent collapse).
And then quickly, shit: the psychology of tiling, summary execution ("dull people," this old tune bumpkins who seeks to distinguish the characters, as if they had a little color to the will, some entertainment to deviate). Shit, not particularly irritating, but disappointing. A lack of panache. What makes the smallness of writing, be limited to testify themselves. That's why I like Marc Levy, since I saw this video promotion (I have a little bit lazy, it's on youtube, for his latest book) and his helmet aviator borderline comical. Marco has at least understood what a readership: a crowd shot.
0 comments:
Post a Comment